Re: [Gc] Re: [PATCH] fixing couple of typos in cord.h
ivmai at mail.ru
Mon May 31 02:03:32 PDT 2010
Mon, 31 May 2010 11:27:09 +0300 Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net>:
> Ivan Maidanski:
> > Mon, 31 May 2010 08:08:30 +0300 Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net>:
> >> Hi,
> >> I've encountered couple of typos in cord.h while reading it. I've
> >> decided to fix them because it took me some time to understand the
> >> text, because I'm not native English speaker.
> > cord is an outdated stuff (and not maintained/updated for a long time), IMHO. Should we really care of something (typos, warnings, K&R style, etc.) except for serious bugs in it?
> I'm sorry but there is link from main page in the following text:
> The garbage collector distribution includes a C string (cord) package
> that provides for fast concatenation and substring operations on long
> strings. A simple curses- and win32-based editor that represents the
> entire file as a cord is included as a sample application.
> So, why the main page don't say anything about cord as outdated stuff?
Because the accompanying documentation needs refining ;).
I guess, cord API is mostly stable since mid 90's.
At present, cord:
- is mostly just a demo app using GC;
- exists for compatibility;
- is used for GC testing.
> If you don't want to merge my patch, it's OK for me.
> But maybe it's worth to update at least main page?
I'd prefer someone to update the docs (which would say the maintenance for cord is discontinued unless a severe bug is found in it).
if you think it would be good to apply this patch, not a big deal to me, I'll do.
More information about the Gc