[Gc] atomic_ops on ARM compile bug
hans.boehm at hp.com
Tue Sep 14 16:00:49 PDT 2010
I unfortunately don't remember the details of what triggers this, and it would be good to document it better. I think we don't need the double generalization on platforms that directly implement compare_and_swap_full?
Since the failure mode here is a compiler error, and we haven't yet seen it on other platforms, I'd be inclined to add a comment to try AO_GENERALIZE_TWICE if something ends up unexpectedly undefined, and just add it for the platforms that need it. It looks to me like strongly ordered architectures are unlikely to need it, powerpc doesn't appear to need it, and alpha and ia64 already have it. Maybe this really is just a bug for ARM?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Maidanski [mailto:ivmai at mail.ru]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 1:38 PM
> To: Gregory Farnum
> Cc: gc at linux.hpl.hp.com; Boehm, Hans
> Subject: Re: [Gc] atomic_ops on ARM compile bug
> Hi, Gregory!
> I see the problem. It seems to me that the problem is not only for arm
> The more reliable fix is to replace AO_GENERALIZE_TWICE with
> !AO_GENERALIZE_ONCE nad define the latter only for x86/amd64.
> Hans -
> your comments, please...
> Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:16:46 -0700 Gregory Farnum <gregf at hq.newdream.net>:
> > I'm one of the developers on Ceph (ceph.newdream.net) and we've been
> > using and enjoying atomic-ops in our userspace stuff. There's a
> > compile-time bug report running on Ubuntu armel, available at:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/635388
> > (I've pasted in the compile error below. )
> > As I imply there, I tried to trace through the macro generation and
> > believe this is simply because ARM provides few enough hardware
> > instructions that generalize.h needs to be run through a few times in
> > order to generate all the macro/function calls in the correct order,
> > so defining AO_GENERALIZE_TWICE for the arm architecture ought to
> > solve this.
> > Sadly, I don't have an ARM platform available to check and our brief
> > attempt to set up a QEMU version failed, so if
> > anybody could somehow confirm this solution for me, I'd appreciate
> You don't need the target platform to see whether the compilation
> succeeds - just use mingwce or VC++ for arm toolchains.
> > Once confirmed, it'd also be good if
> > the fix got put into the appropriate source repositories. :)
> > Thanks!
> > -Greg
> > :
> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -D__CEPH__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> > -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -rdynamic -g -O2 -MT
> > AuthAuthorizeHandler.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/AuthAuthorizeHandler.Tpo -c
> > -o AuthAuthorizeHandler.o `test -f 'auth/AuthAuthorizeHandler.cc' ||
> > echo './'`auth/AuthAuthorizeHandler.cc
> > In file included from ./include/buffer.h:55,
> > from ./include/encoding.h:20,
> > from ./include/object.h:29,
> > from ./include/types.h:64,
> > from auth/Crypto.h:17,
> > from auth/Auth.h:18,
> > from auth/AuthAuthorizeHandler.cc:1:
> > ./include/atomic.h: In member function 'size_t
> > ./include/atomic.h:36: error: 'AO_fetch_and_sub1_write' was not
> > declared in this scope
> > ./include/atomic.h: In member function 'void
> > ceph::atomic_t::sub(int)':
> > ./include/atomic.h:43: error: 'AO_fetch_and_add_write' was not
> > declared in this scope
> > make: *** [AuthAuthorizeHandler.o] Error 1
> > The atomic_ops header is properly included in the referenced atomic.h
> > file, and an earlier line "AO_fetch_and_add1(&val);
> > " compiles without incident.
More information about the Gc