Re: [Gc] Re: Is RTEMS supported by bdwgc now ?
ivmai at mail.ru
Sat Apr 2 22:51:59 PST 2011
Proper virtual memory support is required for incremental/generational modes of GC (which are optional).
If you'd like to port GC to a new arch, please look into doc/porting.html.
Nobody tried to use GC with RTEMS. At least, I'm not aware of (and RTEMS is not mentioned anywhere in the codebase of GC).
Tip: it's better if you will experiment with the recent CVS snapshot of BDWGC instead of using some release tarball (listed eg. on https://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/).
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:07:15 +0800 <lj8175 at gmail.com>:
> On the wiki page(https://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/) I see
> provides incremental and generational collection under operating systems
> which provide the right kind of virtual memory support."
> Is this meaning an operating system which want to use gc must have virtual
> memory support?
> An operating systems which don't have virtual memory support can use gc or
> not ? Can port or not ?
> Is RTEMS supported by bdwgc now ?
More information about the Gc